Good day,
I've setup the explorer for CTV Signet which is now up and running at
[https://explorer.ctvsignet.com](https://explorer.ctvsignet.com/)
Best,
[@0x0ff](https://twitter.com/0x0ff_)
------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, February 17th, 2022 at 9:58 PM, Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I have been running a CTV signet for around a year and it's seen little use.
> Early on I had some issues syncing new nodes, but I have verified syncability
> to this signet using
> https://github.com/JeremyRubin/bitcoin/tree/checktemplateverify-signet-23.0-alpha.
> Please use this signet!
>
> ```
> [signet]
> signetchallenge=512102946e8ba8eca597194e7ed90377d9bbebc5d17a9609ab3e35e706612ee882759351ae
> addnode=50.18.75.225
> ```
>
> This should be operational. Let me know if there are any issues you
> experience (likely with signet itself, but CTV too).
>
> Feel free to also email me an address and I can send you some signet coins --
> if anyone is interested in running an automatic faucet I would love help with
> that and will send you a lot of coins.
>
> AJ Wrote (in another thread):
>
>> I'd much rather see some real> third-party experimentation *somewhere*
>> public first, and Jeremy's CTV
>> signet being completely empty seems like a bad sign to me. Maybe that
>> means we should tentatively merge the feature and deploy it on the
>> default global signet though? Not really sure how best to get more
>> real world testing; but "deploy first, test later" doesn't sit right.
>
> I agree that real experimentation would be great, and think that merging the
> code (w/o activation) for signet would likely help users v.s. custom
> builds/parameters.
>
> I am unsure that "learning in public" is required -- personally I do
> experiments on regtest regularly and on mainnet (using emulators) more
> occasionally. I think some of the difficulty is that for setting up signet
> stuff you need to wait e.g. 10 minutes for blocks and stuff, source faucet
> coins, etc. V.s. regtest you can make tests that run automatically. Maybe
> seeing more regtest RPC test samples for regtests would be a sufficient
> in-between?
>
> Best,
>
> Jeremy
>
> --
> [@JeremyRubin](https://twitter.com/JeremyRubin)
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
