On April 21, 2022 5:10:02 AM GMT+02:00, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >@DavidHarding > >Interesting proposal to revert consensus changes. Is it possible to do this >for soft forks that are already activated? > >Example: Some users are not okay with witness discount in segwit transactions > >https://nitter.net/giacomozucco/status/1513614380121927682 That specific case isn't a good example as reverting the discount would actually be a soft fork, as it is a tightening of existing rules. In fact, it'd be a block size decrease. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
- [bitcoin-dev] Automatically reverting (&q... David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatically reve... Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatically ... alicexbt via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatica... Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automa... Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] A... Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-de... Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatica... Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatically reve... Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatically ... David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automatica... Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] Automa... David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] A... Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-de... David A. Harding via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoi... Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoi... Corey Haddad via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] A... James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-de... James O'Beirne via bitcoin-dev