On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:07:54PM -0400, Greg Sanders wrote: > I don't doubt the use case(it's why I opened the issue!). I didn't want the > proposal to die in case people found it odd that 61, 62, 63, but not 64 > bytes ended up being broadcast able. > > Perhaps this is not an issue, especially since this isn't a consensus > change like the Great Consensus Cleanup. Willing to change my proposal and > PR if people have no strong objections.
I think it's fine if we only restrict 64 bytes. We have a specific reason to do that and it's ok if we just tell people that. Only fairly-technical use-cases are affected anyway. -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
