On 5/9/23 09:32, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:
obviously it's easy enough to evade if every non-economic user simply > keeps enough bitcoin around and sends it back to himself > > so
maybeit's a useless idea? but maybe that's enough of a hassle to stop >
people (it certainly breaks ordinals, since it can never be 1 sat)
Padding the change is not just a hassle, it requires holding extra BTC
in a hot wallet, which has a cost.
Spenders could also get around the rule by paying miners off-network,
but having to do so would be an appropriate penalty for broadcasting a
non-economic transaction.
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
