if we forget about backward compatibility and the impact of other types of transactions, then the following two options would be possible: a) allocate only up to 10% of the space in the block for non-standard transactions - then all senders of non-standard transactions will compete with each other and it's only 10% with other types of transactions. In the absence of non-standard transactions, all space of the block will be given to standard ones. And in the absence of standard transactions - all space of the block will be given to non-standard ones. If bitcoin-chain was created primarily for standard transactions, then such a model will have to be supported by the majority. b) change the architecture in such a way that the onchain ordinals transaction became much more expensive, which would force them to go to their own type of the LN - this would be a kind of justice, like the displacement of small transactions from the onchain to the LN happening already now
-- Thank you, we will succeed! | Dziękujemy, uda nam się! President of NGO FinTechAssociation | Prezes organizacji pozarządowej FinTechStowarzyszenie *Dipl.-Ing. *Aleksandr Kwaskoff Telegram t.me/kwaskoff Poland, Warsaw | Polska, Warszawa [image: --] President of NGO FinTechAssociation <http://t.me/finteh> Aleksandr Kwaskoff [image: https://]about.me/kwaskoff <https://about.me/kwaskoff?promo=email_sig&utm_source=email_sig&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=external_links>
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev