On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 10:43 PM <vju...@gazeta.pl> wrote: > > I think it should be fixed. Because now, sending coins into P2WPKH is cheaper > than sending them to P2TR, even though finally, when those coins are spent, > the blockspace usage is cheaper for Taproot (when you spend by key) than for > Segwit, because public key hash is not stored anywhere. But of course, > because the cost is splitted between sender and spender, it is more > profitable to send to P2WPKH, and spend from P2TR.
The difference between P2WPKH and P2TR is a different topic, I think. A single bloated transaction would be treated with higher priority than a number of simple transactions of the same total size and fee - irrespectively of P2WPKH and P2TR type. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
