Messages by Date
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Andy Schroder
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Andy Schroder
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Eric Lombrozo
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Andy Schroder
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/22
[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin at POS using BIP70, NFC and offline payments - implementer feedback
Jan Vornberger
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tom Harding
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Natanael
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tom Harding
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Natanael
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
joliver
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Natanael
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Bryan Bishop
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Adam Back
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Matt Whitlock
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Eric Lombrozo
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Natanael
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Eric Lombrozo
-
2015/02/22
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Eric Lombrozo
-
2015/02/22
[Bitcoin-development] alternate proposal opt-in miner takes double-spend (Re: replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4)
Adam Back
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Jeff Garzik
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Jorge Timón
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Jeff Garzik
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mark Friedenbach
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Jorge Timón
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Chris Pacia
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Chris Pacia
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Adam Back
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation.
木ノ下じょな
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation.
Pavol Rusnak
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation.
木ノ下じょな
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation.
Pavol Rusnak
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation.
木ノ下じょな
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/21
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation.
Adam Back
-
2015/02/21
[Bitcoin-development] Request for a new BIP number (and discussion): Improved HD wallet generation.
木ノ下じょな
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Adam Back
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Gregory Maxwell
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Adam Back
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Gregory Maxwell
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Adam Back
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin ATM
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/20
[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin ATM
Fikret AKIN
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/20
Re: [Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Wladimir
-
2015/02/20
[Bitcoin-development] bloom filtering, privacy
Adam Back
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Jorge Timón
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Angel Leon
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Sean Gilligan
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Jorge Timón
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Bryan Bishop
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] What's what with addr relaying?
Thy Shizzle
-
2015/02/19
[Bitcoin-development] What's what with addr relaying?
Thy Shizzle
-
2015/02/19
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Troy Benjegerdes
-
2015/02/18
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/18
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/18
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/18
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Troy Benjegerdes
-
2015/02/17
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 released
Tim Blokdijk
-
2015/02/17
Re: [Bitcoin-development] More precise type information in API reference
Dario Teixeira
-
2015/02/17
Re: [Bitcoin-development] More precise type information in API reference
David A. Harding
-
2015/02/17
Re: [Bitcoin-development] More precise type information in API reference
Dario Teixeira
-
2015/02/17
[Bitcoin-development] More precise type information in API reference
Dario Teixeira
-
2015/02/16
[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 released
Wladimir
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
joliver
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Adam Gibson
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Troy Benjegerdes
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Troy Benjegerdes
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/15
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/15
[Bitcoin-development] P2P tests: peers.dat's requested
Ethan Heilman
-
2015/02/14
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Luke Dashjr
-
2015/02/14
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Jorge Timón
-
2015/02/14
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Bryan Bishop
-
2015/02/14
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Adam Back
-
2015/02/14
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Ross Nicoll
-
2015/02/14
Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/14
[Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?)
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/13
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
Thomas Kerin
-
2015/02/13
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/13
[Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 final was tagged
Wladimir
-
2015/02/13
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
Ruben de Vries
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tom Harding
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
Luke Dashjr
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Josh Lehan
-
2015/02/12
[Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic multisig addresses
Thomas Kerin
-
2015/02/12
[Bitcoin-development] BIP for deterministic pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses
Thomas Kerin
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Allen Piscitello
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Natanael
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Gregory Maxwell
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Allen Piscitello
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Alan Reiner
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Allen Piscitello
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tom Harding
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Oleg Andreev
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Btc Drak
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Lawrence Nahum
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Natanael
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Natanael
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Jeff Garzik
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Natanael
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Alex Mizrahi
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Natanael
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Alex Mizrahi
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Requiring a miner's signature in the block header
Ittay
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Alex Mizrahi
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Oleg Andreev
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Natanael
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Alex Mizrahi
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Natanael
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/12
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Alex Mizrahi
-
2015/02/11
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/11
Re: [Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Tamas Blummer
-
2015/02/11
[Bitcoin-development] replace-by-fee v0.10.0rc4
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/11
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin-development Digest, Vol 45, Issue 37
Joshua
-
2015/02/11
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Requiring a miner's signature in the block header
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/11
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Requiring a miner's signature in the block header
Natanael
-
2015/02/11
[Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Requiring a miner's signature in the block header
Hector Chu
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI
MⒶrtin HⒶboⓋštiak
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Natanael
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
MⒶrtin HⒶboⓋštiak
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
MⒶrtin HⒶboⓋštiak
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Natanael
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Natanael
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Oleg Andreev
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
MⒶrtin HⒶboⓋštiak
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Natanael
-
2015/02/10
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
MⒶrtin HⒶboⓋštiak
-
2015/02/10
[Bitcoin-development] Standardizing automatic pre-negotiation of transaction terms with BIP70? (Emulating Amazon one-click purchase at all merchants)
Natanael
-
2015/02/09
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Update to Double-Spend Deprecation Window Proposal
Tom Harding
-
2015/02/08
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Update to Double-Spend Deprecation Window Proposal
Peter Todd
-
2015/02/08
[Bitcoin-development] Update to Double-Spend Deprecation Window Proposal
Tom Harding
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] [softfork proposal] Strict DER signatures
Pieter Wuille
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements
Peter D. Gray
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits
Gregory Maxwell
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits
Justus Ranvier
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits
Jeff Garzik
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements
Mike Hearn
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] determining change addresses using the least significant digits
Wladimir
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin Core 0.10.0rc4 tagged
Wladimir
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI
MⒶrtin HⒶboⓋštiak
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements
Eric Voskuil
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal for P2P Wireless (Bluetooth LE) transfer of Payment URI
Roy Badami
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements
Andreas Schildbach
-
2015/02/06
Re: [Bitcoin-development] Two Proposed BIPs - Bluetooth Communication and bitcoin: URI Scheme Improvements
Andreas Schildbach