On Monday, July 16, 2012 11:47:02 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > Vladimir does raise a fair point, though. Hackathon seems appropriate > for bitcoin.org as it is focused on dev-related activities. (full > disclosure: speaking at bitcoin2012.com) The conference might or > might not be. The conference does seem community focused, so I don't > object to it being on bitcoin.org... But if consensus prefers > otherwise, that's OK too.
IMO, bitcoin.org is more community-focussed anyway. How often do devs use the site, compared to GitHub etc? Someone else made a pullreq for Bitcoin Magazine; I suggest(ed) that for-profit organizations should be asked to pitch in some way or another. Who should organize that, I don't know. If Bitcoin Consultancy/Amir is behind the conference, I suggest their/his development contributions should be sufficient in that respect. > PS. This seems like material for pull requests, which is preferred > over mailing list email + git push. When working on the satoshi > client, we all ACK each other's pull req for anything beyond the > trivial. I concur, this should be discussed in a pullreq. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
