On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Luke-Jr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote:
> But more important to the success of BIP today, I think, is encouraging
> wider
> community participation.
It's not about BIP process, it's possibly about content of particular
proposals.
> The stratum mining mess seems to be a direct result
There's no mess with stratum mining, except in your head. There's no
requirement to have BIP for everything what people do. Stratum is NOT
related to bitcoin protocol or bitcoin implementation, it is just custom,
pooled-mining extension and bitcoin network doesn't need to know about
Stratum existence at all.
> and lack of any peer review/contribution toward the stratum protocol.
There have been peer review of the protocol. You wanted to say "I was not
invited to do peer review", right?
Please don't start it AGAIN and stop bashing Stratum in your posts, at
least in bitcoin-dev mailing list.
I promised to write BIP draft for Stratum, I proposed and implemented
get_transactions method to allow Stratum jobs inspection. What more do you
want, seriously? I'm soo tired by you, Luke.
slush
P.S. I'm sorry that other developers had to read such posts. I'll try to
sit on my hands next time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management.
Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center
Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues
Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
