I have some more questions.
1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)?
2) Should the current wiki pages be taken down / forwarded to the git repo or be auto updated from the git repo?
3) Even though the information in BIP 50 is valuable, should it really be considered a BIP?
On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgar...@bitpay.com> wrote:
On Oct 21, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgar...@bitpay.com> wrote:
The goal is to improve the process, hash-seal our specs, and create an
easy way for anyone with at least an email address to participate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
