Hi Jeff, such a vote is up there since March:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149150.0 Votes are in favor of it. Advantages are obvious: 1. having satoshi as 1/100 of the main unit is familiar to people like USD and cent 2. All existing financial software can deal/store big numbers but typically only 2 decimals. 3. Split could be linked with the introduction of the ISO code in one step. Lets get it finally done. On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:05:06 -0500 Jeff Garzik <jgar...@bitpay.com> wrote: > would suggest posting on all possible forums "proposal: switch to >uBTC, labelled as ISO prefers (XBT?)" and see what sort of discussion >is generated. If the support is broad, it will be plain from the >responses if there is a consensus. Perhaps everyone will agree it is >the best course, and we can make an easy change. > >But we need less "core dev fiat" not more :) > >-- >Jeff Garzik >Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist >BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ Regards, Tamás Blummer Founder, CEO http://bitsofproof.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
