On 1/4/14, David Vorick <david.vor...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you have the resources to attack one of the bigger altcoins, you > probably have a significant investment in the cryptocurrency space, and a > significant interest in protecting it. Compromising even something like > dogecoin would cause a lot of questions to be raised and likely drop the > value of bitcoin as well as all the cryptocurrencies using the same work > function as dogecoin. > > Right now, there's very little benefit to attacking a significant currency, > because it would be very expensive and likely traumatize the whole system. > Unless it's some power like the NSA, I don't think there's much to worry > about.
The launch thread says it clear: "very scrypt, such random, much profit, wow, many coin". So it seems that Dogecoin doesn't use SHA256 like Bitcoin, but scrypt like most of the other scamcoins. Anyway, I don't see anything in your comment in favor or against merged mining... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
