On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgar...@bitpay.com> wrote:
> There's a reason why luke-jr's pull request for CPfP remains open.
>
> There is general agreement that it appears to be useful. CPfP works
> to close the mismatch between how bitcoin transaction fees are
> attached by the sender, versus modern economic situations where the
> receiver is willing to pay a fee.
>
The only thing controversial are the code changes themselves, not the
feature.
Consensus running through the comments in the pull is that it needs
(auto)tests.
Are you going to do this Luke? Or is anyone else working on this?
Wladimir
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
