On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:44:52AM -0600, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > Ignoring prefixes the cost for each reusable address is only a small > > percentage of the full node cost (rational: each transaction has one > > or more ECDSA signatures, and the derivation is no more expensive), so > > I would only expect computation to be an issue for large centralized > > services. (non-full nodes suffer more from just the bandwidth impact). > > I have not seen anyone address my high-level question to (somewhat) > complicated > mechanisms to keep coin flows private. > > Who pays for it? From what I see it's going to double the amount of data > needed per address, further centralizing 'full' nodes. I'm fine if the NSA
Actually the exact encoding is still undetermined - other encodings I proposed in my original paper are the same size or even smaller than a standard transaction. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 000000000000000190a2900f1a25c507a999fa11116f7bd0126618c1ebc4f5fb
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
