On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Wladimir <laa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtog...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If you are > > Another option: Instead of statically building it'd be easy enough to > build against the 4.6 Qt headers instead without even swapping the > library. Qt is, after all, forward-compatible - between the 4.x > versions. This will lose some GUI features but if compatibility is > more important here that's a choice that can be made.
Are you sure this is Qt 4.6 at all? Not Qt 4.7? I'd expect *much* more symbols if this was a Qt 4.8 versus 4.6 conflict. Qt 4.7 introduced a lot of new things (see all the occurences of #if QT_VERSION >= 0x040700 - things like setPlaceHolderText would be expected to pop up too), but 4.8 did not. Can you check? Wladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
