On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:12 AM, <odinn.cyberguerri...@riseup.net> wrote: > You are right there is a bug in there. > > But the value is not 25% I think. Tinker some more. :-) > >> >> Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig-> key recoveries >> would fail erroneously...
Values 2 and 3 are only needed in theory. They together shouldn't occur more than once in 2**127 (when the signature value is between the group size and the field size). That said, this is indeed a bug. -- Pieter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
