-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/19/2014 11:38 PM, J Ross Nicoll wrote: > That's not great, certainly, but how many nodes actually require > that level of security
All of them. While the rest of the 'net is busy deprecating HTTP and all other unencrypted transport methods, why is it(*) even a debate? Security should be on by default. Make users who don't want it jump through hoops to turn it off instead of the other way around. (*) where "it" is the desirability of blocking passive surveillance, not the particular algorithm to use. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJT8+AdAAoJEMP3uyY4RQ21kv8IANDkveCGJX5b5c+waXTHcEf0 MgrGlkUZgZaP+fNNME32MEeQMywkyHohZly1KKYyqf+Qi2YkZ7rFiZj5e16EtGVK zBQCrvOyMZVv/tWPfRxrZV+jC5dUBPryaCV3XwyK3w8u5WpDhpC1be6uBjY6qtTB 58MzdMBEEwceUwDezAIpGxsr5fKw+by4WyL23HQybSgUSHWh9S9hSp4dY1L8sDdr atdFOvjiwY7zQe9V4mrtSv2pwmWIfOJE3RBhwSdPBtsMqO0PAnUEmxKYANQjh8qV W147aQT97DYkWb3TucY+gVbsfKSzvNoiXwvWMpmXT1Kz8wia0vX7MoPBtO6+uOk= =6tJk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
0x38450DB5.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development