On 09/12/2014 08:43 PM, Aaron Voisine wrote: > Should BIP72 require that signed payment requests be from the same > domain,
Although it currently does not seem to be used that way, I'd like to see merchants sign their payment requests but store them on their payment processors server. Currently if you buy from Humble Bundle, all you see is Coinbase which is unfortunate. > and also require https? I think that's unrealistic. HTTP is already in use, and also the proposed spec is open to other transports, e.g. Bluetooth which is also already in common use. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
