On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wui...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I suggest we either change STRICTENC to simply fail unrecognized pubkeys >> immediately - similar to how non-standard signatures are treated - or >> fail the script if the pubkey is non-standard and signature verification >> succeeds. > > Sounds good to me, I disliked those semantics too.
Of course: do we apply this rule to all pubkeys passed to CHECKMULTISIG (my preference...), or just the ones that are otherwise checked? This will likely make existing outputs hard to spend as well (I don't have numbers), are we okay with that? We probably can't make this a consensus rule, as it may make existing P2SH outputs/addresses unspendable. -- Pieter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
