Agree, There are many legitimate uses for a larger OP_RETURN, and application developers are already complaining that the current size is not enough. It is about adding value to the blockchain. I know it can grow the blockchain faster, but so far at 40 bytes Bitcoin hasn't experienced death by bloat, nor that is even close to happen. I understand starting with a prudent approach, but I think it is safe to increase this without worrying. Actually I would make it even bigger than 80 bytes.
Cheers On 17/11/14 02:30, Wladimir wrote: > Agreed. I'm in favor of increasing OP_RETURN size as well. Don't care > about the actual size. -- Be Happy :)
0x310A8A5B.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
<<attachment: root.vcf>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
