On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandre...@gmail.com> wrote: > DERSIG BIP looks great to me, just a few nit-picky changes suggested: > > You mention the "DER standard" : should link to > http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com17/languages/X.690-0207.pdf (or > whatever is best reference for DER). > > "this would simplify avoiding OpenSSL in consensus implementations" --> > "this would make it easier for non-OpenSSL implementations" > > "causing opcode failure" : I know what you mean by "opcode failure", but it > might be good to be more explicit. > > "since v0.8.0, and nearly no transactions" --> "and very few > transactions..." > > "reducing this avenue for malleability is useful on itself as well" : > awkward English. How about just "This proposal has the added benefit of > reducing transaction malleability (see BIP62)."
Nit addressed, hopefully. -- Pieter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
