On Feb 12, 2015, at 3:16 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote:
> You can not consider the outcome resulting by replace-by-fee fraudulent, as 
> it could be the world as observed by some.
> 
> Fraudulent in what sense?

Assume a wallet that sends double spend of the coin spent for services with 
higher fees to some of its nodes simultaneously.
Merchants will catch and reject most of the attempts, but that will not stop 
the scheme in a setup where customer are anonymous and distant.

Miner will see a mixed picture and will struggle to act “honestly” on a 
statistical measure.

Tamas Blummer


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

Reply via email to