On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: > And then what? So you know the block matches. But with reasonable FP rates > every block will match at least a few transactions (this is already the case
This approach needs a filter set with a lower FP rate. It doesn't depend on having a high FP rate for privacy (which is good, since counting on filter false positives seems to more or less fail to deliver actual privacy in any case.) Larger filters mean a somewhat higher baseline bandwidth, though when users do not reuse addresses and have more addresses than there are txouts in the block the gap is narrower. > Ah, I see, I didn't catch that this scheme relies on UTXO commitments This is talking about a committed bloom filter. Not a committed UTXO set. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
