On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:05:44AM -0700, Jeff Garzik wrote: > A general assumption is that you will have a few archive nodes with the > full blockchain, and a majority of nodes are pruned, able to serve only the > tail of the chains.
Hmm? Lots of people are tossing around ideas for partial archival nodes that would store a subset of blocks, such that collectively the whole blockchain would be available even if no one node had the entire chain. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 0000000000000000156d2069eeebb3309455f526cfe50efbf8a85ec630df7f7c
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
