On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote:
> > Since you keep bringing this up, I'll try to clarify this once again. >> > > I understand the arguments against it. And I think you are agreeing with > me - Adam is bemoaning the way developers outsource stuff to third party > services, and suggesting it is relevant to the block size debate. And we > are saying, no, it's happening because it's easier than doing things in a > decentralised way. > The fact that using a centralized service is easier isn't a good reason IMHO. It disregards the long-term, and introduces systemic risk. But in cases where using a decentralized approach doesn't *add* anything, I cannot reasonably promote it, and that's why I was against getutxos in the P2P protocol. -- Pieter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
