bitcoindev  

Messages by Thread

• [bitcoindev] FROST CLI + BDK CLI Demo Christopher Allen
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Add BIP-0093 (Codex32) as application to BIP-0085 'Ben Westgate' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Add BIP-0093 (Codex32) as application to BIP-0085 Javier Mateos
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Add BIP-0093 (Codex32) as application to BIP-0085 'Ben Westgate' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Add BIP-0093 (Codex32) as application to BIP-0085 Javier Mateos
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 29.1 release candidate 2 available fanquake
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Elliptic Curve Operations for Bitcoin Script Olaoluwa Osuntokun
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Elliptic Curve Operations for Bitcoin Script jeremy
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Elliptic Curve Operations for Bitcoin Script jeremy
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] OP_TWEAKADD jeremy
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] OP_TWEAKADD jeremy
• [bitcoindev] Glock: Garbled Locks for Bitcoin 'Liam Eagen' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] BIP Booby Trapped Wallets - Covenant-Only Taproot Outputs Matias Monteagudo
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Block template sharing Anthony Towns
• [bitcoindev] Workshops and Activation for CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and CHECKSIGFROMSTACK /dev /fd0
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Workshops and Activation for CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and CHECKSIGFROMSTACK Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Workshops and Activation for CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and CHECKSIGFROMSTACK /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Workshops and Activation for CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and CHECKSIGFROMSTACK Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin 'Bitcoin Foundation' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin 'Bitcoin Foundation' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin 'ArmchairCryptologist' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin 'Bitcoin Foundation' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin 'ArmchairCryptologist' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin Alex Pruden
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin 'Bitcoin Foundation' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [Draft BIP] Quantum-Resistant Transition Framework for Bitcoin Murch
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] No burn, Quantum Migration Proposal, Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE) 'James T' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] No burn, Quantum Migration Proposal, Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE) 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] No burn, Quantum Migration Proposal, Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE) 'James T' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] No burn, Quantum Migration Proposal, Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE) Javier Mateos
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] No burn, Quantum Migration Proposal, Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE) Erik Aronesty
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] No burn, Quantum Migration Proposal, Quantum Secure Asset Verification & Escrow (QSAVE) 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Feedbacks on libbitcoinkernel & bitcoin backbone Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] RGB formal specifciation Maxim Orlovsky
• [bitcoindev] [ann] FROST Signing for Bitcoin: Demo + Taproot Integration Discussion @ Aug 6 Gordian Call Christopher Allen
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Utreexo Nodes Calvin Kim
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Utreexo Nodes Javier Mateos
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Utreexo Nodes K Calvin
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Utreexo Nodes Murch
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Utreexo Nodes Calvin Kim
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 29.1 release candidate available Gloria Zhao
• [bitcoindev] Taproot is post-quantum secure when restricted to script-path spends Tim Ruffing
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Taproot is post-quantum secure when restricted to script-path spends Maxim Orlovsky
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Taproot is post-quantum secure when restricted to script-path spends Ethan Heilman
• [bitcoindev] Revisiting secp256r1 signatures (i.e. P256, mobile HSM support) Josh Doman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Revisiting secp256r1 signatures (i.e. P256, mobile HSM support) 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Revisiting secp256r1 signatures (i.e. P256, mobile HSM support) Josh Doman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Revisiting secp256r1 signatures (i.e. P256, mobile HSM support) Javier Mateos
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Revisiting secp256r1 signatures (i.e. P256, mobile HSM support) Greg Tonoski
• [bitcoindev] libsecp256k1 v0.7.0 released Tim Ruffing
• [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Human meaningful witness versioning Ethan Heilman
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) 'Donald Dienst' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) Boris Nagaev
  • [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) 'Donald Dienst' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) Lucas Barbosa
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) Christian Riley
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) Murch
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Proof-of-Activity Reclamation (PoAR) Javier Mateos
• [bitcoindev] New BIP Editors: 1 Year Later 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: New BIP Editors: 1 Year Later Jon Atack
  • Re: [bitcoindev] New BIP Editors: 1 Year Later Anthony Towns
• [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Compressed Base58 Encoding for BIP-39 Mnemonics with Multisig Extensions Zach
  • Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Proposal] Compressed Base58 Encoding for BIP-39 Mnemonics with Multisig Extensions 'Russell O'Connor' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Jameson Lopp
  • [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Tadge Dryja
  • [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Marin Ivezic
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Boris Nagaev
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Post Quantum Migration Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Boris Nagaev
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Post Quantum Migration Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Boris Nagaev
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Post Quantum Migration Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Ethan Heilman
  • [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Boris Nagaev
  • [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Marc Johnson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Jameson Lopp
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Marc Johnson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Saint Wenhao
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: A Post Quantum Migration Proposal Saint Wenhao
• [bitcoindev] RGB consensus layer released for production deployments Maxim Orlovsky
• [bitcoindev] [taproot][script] 4-leaf Taproot Merkle Tree in Python: testnet implementation + control block analysis aaron.recompile
• [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Rijndael
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Rijndael
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Ademan
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Garlo Nicon
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Greg Maxwell
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Murch
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] A Taproot-native (re-)bindable transaction bundle proposal Peter Todd
• [bitcoindev] Changes to BIP-360 - Pay to Quantum Resistant Hash (P2QRH) Ethan Heilman
• [bitcoindev] Proposal for Decentralized Satellite-Based Bitcoin Nodes 'BitMan' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Proposal for Decentralized Satellite-Based Bitcoin Nodes Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Make pathological transactions with more than 2500 legacy signature operations non-standard Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 28.2 Released 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] Descriptors using H as a hardened indicator 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • [bitcoindev] Re: What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Harsha Goli
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Ethan Heilman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Josh Doman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Chris Stewart
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Josh Doman
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] What's a good stopping point? Making the case for the capabilities enabled by CTV+CSFS Josh Doman
• [bitcoindev] Proposal: Self-Verifiable Transaction Broadcast Log for Enhanced User Transparency wang wang
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Proposal: Self-Verifiable Transaction Broadcast Log for Enhanced User Transparency Murch
• [bitcoindev] Full-Disclosure: CVE-2025-27586 "No Santa Claus under the Lightning Sun" Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Full-Disclosure: CVE-2025-27586 "No Santa Claus under the Lightning Sun" David A. Harding
  • Re: [bitcoindev] Full-Disclosure: CVE-2025-27586 "No Santa Claus under the Lightning Sun" Antoine Riard
• [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Bryan Bishop
  • [bitcoindev] Re: The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Michael Folkson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Dave Scotese
  • The Case for Decentralizing Bitcoin Core Development [was Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core] Christopher Allen
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Bryan Bishop
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core TheCharlatan
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core waxwing/ AdamISZ
  • Re: [bitcoindev] The case for privatizing Bitcoin Core Bryan Bishop
• [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Michael Folkson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Michael Folkson
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter /dev /fd0
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Paul Sztorc
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter David A. Harding
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Antoine Riard
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Peter Todd
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Anthony Towns
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Harsha Goli
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Sjors Provoost
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Brandon Black
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Paul Sztorc
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Saint Wenhao
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Melvin Carvalho
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Greg Sanders
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Harsha Goli
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter James O'Beirne
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Matt Corallo
  • Re: [bitcoindev] CTV + CSFS: a letter Andrew Poelstra

• Earlier messages