bitcoindev  

Messages by Date

• 2026/04/16 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol 'bubb1es' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/16 RE: [bitcoindev] Hornet Update: A declarative executable specification of Bitcoin consensus rules 'Toby Sharp' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/16 Re: [bitcoindev] PQC - What is our Goal, Even? 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/16 Re: [bitcoindev] PQC - What is our Goal, Even? Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/16 Re: [bitcoindev] PQC - What is our Goal, Even? Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/16 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Garlo Nicon
• 2026/04/16 Re: [bitcoindev] PQC - What is our Goal, Even? Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/16 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 RE: [bitcoindev] Hornet Update: A declarative executable specification of Bitcoin consensus rules eric
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Anthony Towns
• 2026/04/15 [bitcoindev] Hornet Update: A declarative executable specification of Bitcoin consensus rules 'Toby Sharp' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge Boris Nagaev
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Anthony Towns
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type محمد الوصابي
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] PQC - What is our Goal, Even? Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/15 [bitcoindev] Re: Formal verification of secp256k1 modular scalar multiplication jeremy
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/15 [bitcoindev] PQC - What is our Goal, Even? Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 [bitcoindev] PQC - What is our Goal, Even? Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] BIP 54 active on Bitcoin Inquisition b10c
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Ethan Heilman
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Ethan Heilman
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Ethan Heilman
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Deactivating ECDSA/Schnorr Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Deactivating ECDSA/Schnorr Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Deactivating ECDSA/Schnorr Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Deactivating ECDSA/Schnorr Alex
• 2026/04/15 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol Murch
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Deactivating ECDSA/Schnorr Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Deactivating ECDSA/Schnorr 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Subject: Eltoo / LN-Symmetry on Inquisition Signet: BIP 118 + 3-Round State Chain (APO+CTV) Sergio Demian Lerner
• 2026/04/14 [bitcoindev] Deactivating ECDSA/Schnorr Erik Aronesty
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: Subject: Eltoo / LN-Symmetry on Inquisition Signet: BIP 118 + 3-Round State Chain (APO+CTV) aaron.recompile
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type thomas suau
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/14 [bitcoindev] Re: Subject: Eltoo / LN-Symmetry on Inquisition Signet: BIP 118 + 3-Round State Chain (APO+CTV) Greg Sanders
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Thomas Suau
• 2026/04/14 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs Craig Raw
• 2026/04/14 [bitcoindev] Subject: Eltoo / LN-Symmetry on Inquisition Signet: BIP 118 + 3-Round State Chain (APO+CTV) aaron.recompile
• 2026/04/13 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs 'Sean Carlin' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge sadiq Ismail
• 2026/04/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge Alex
• 2026/04/13 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'Hayashi' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/13 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/13 [bitcoindev] Benchmarking SLH-DSA STARK Aggregation 'remix7531' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/11 [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Worst-Case Taproot Witness Weight Estimation Jan Thomasewsky
• 2026/04/11 [bitcoindev] Re: A slight change proposed on Committing to quantum resistance: a slow defence for Bitcoin against a fast quantum computing attack Daniel Buchner
• 2026/04/10 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Antoine Riard
• 2026/04/10 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'Hayashi' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/10 [bitcoindev] Proposal for minimum viable PQC protection without a fork Daniel Buchner
• 2026/04/10 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Ethan Heilman
• 2026/04/10 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/10 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/10 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol 'bubb1es' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol 'bubb1es' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Matt Corallo
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge Olaoluwa Osuntokun
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type Olaoluwa Osuntokun
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge Olaoluwa Osuntokun
• 2026/04/09 [bitcoindev] Re: In defense of a PQ output type Dplusplus
• 2026/04/09 [bitcoindev] Re: Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge Olaoluwa Osuntokun
• 2026/04/09 [bitcoindev] In defense of a PQ output type 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Against Allowing Quantum Recovery of Bitcoin Jameson Lopp
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Against Allowing Quantum Recovery of Bitcoin Jameson Lopp
• 2026/04/09 Re: [bitcoindev] Against Allowing Quantum Recovery of Bitcoin Bitcoin
• 2026/04/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] 24 bits for nVersion nonce space instead of 16 Sjors Provoost
• 2026/04/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/08 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] 24 bits for nVersion nonce space instead of 16 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/07 [bitcoindev] Post-Quantum BIP-86 Recovery via zk-STARK Proof of BIP-32 Seed Knowledge Olaoluwa Osuntokun
• 2026/04/07 [bitcoindev] Formal verification of secp256k1 modular scalar multiplication 'remix7531' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/07 [bitcoindev] New bitcoin backbone code release: addr / tx relay mngt + multiproces support layout Antoine Riard
• 2026/04/06 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol Murch
• 2026/04/06 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs STEVEN SLATER
• 2026/04/06 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol STEVEN SLATER
• 2026/04/06 [bitcoindev] A slight change proposed on Committing to quantum resistance: a slow defence for Bitcoin against a fast quantum computing attack PYM
• 2026/04/06 [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs 'Sean Carlin' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/04/06 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol Murch
• 2026/04/02 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/31 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP-352: Limiting the number of per-group recipients (K_max) Sebastian Falbesoner
• 2026/03/31 Re: [bitcoindev] BIP 54 active on Bitcoin Inquisition Antoine Riard
• 2026/03/31 Re: [bitcoindev] BIP Idea: Scrambling BIP39 recovery seeds Jameson Lopp
• 2026/03/31 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin Core 31.0 Release Candidate 2 Available 'Ava Chow' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/30 [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Dust UTXO Disposal Protocol 'bubb1es' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/28 [bitcoindev] Post Quantum HD Wallets with fallback SPHINCS keys 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/28 [bitcoindev] BIP Idea: Scrambling BIP39 recovery seeds dr.oso.phila.cgeyb via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/28 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] 24 bits for nVersion nonce space instead of 16 Anthony Towns
• 2026/03/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Wallet Backup Metadata Format Christopher Allen
• 2026/03/27 [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Wallet Backup Metadata Format pyth
• 2026/03/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
• 2026/03/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/26 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs 'Sean Carlin' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/26 [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs 'Sean Carlin' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/26 Re: [bitcoindev] [3/4] OP_TX Anthony Towns
• 2026/03/26 [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs Thomas Suau
• 2026/03/26 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs pyth
• 2026/03/25 [bitcoindev] Building a CoinPool with OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY Antoine Riard
• 2026/03/25 [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] Blind Relay: Stateless Encrypted WebSocket Coordination for PSBTs 'Sean Carlin' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/24 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) aaron.recompile
• 2026/03/23 [bitcoindev] BIP324 transport performance: CPU baseline, GPU offload, batching and latency tradeoffs Vano Chkheidze
• 2026/03/23 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Alex
• 2026/03/23 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Martin Habovštiak
• 2026/03/23 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format 'orenz0' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/23 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Martin Habovštiak
• 2026/03/18 "wrapped Taproot" from RIPEMD-160 collisions, Was: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Ethan Heilman
• 2026/03/18 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Saint Wenhao
• 2026/03/17 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2026/03/17 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2026/03/17 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) sashabeton
• 2026/03/17 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Saint Wenhao
• 2026/03/16 [bitcoindev] [Draft BIP proposal] Ladder script defenwycke
• 2026/03/16 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) sashabeton
• 2026/03/16 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Alex
• 2026/03/16 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) sashabeton
• 2026/03/16 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Alex
• 2026/03/16 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Saint Wenhao
• 2026/03/16 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) Martin Habovštiak
• 2026/03/16 [bitcoindev] [BIP proposal] Pay to Schnorr Key Hash (P2SKH) sashabeton
• 2026/03/16 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP idea: Timelock-Recovery storage format 'orenz0' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/12 [bitcoindev] Submission of varops budget and tapscript leaf 0xc2 BIPS (aka "Script Restoration") for BIP numbers. Rusty Russell
• 2026/03/12 Re: [bitcoindev] [4/4] New Opcodes for Tapscript v2 'Brandon Black' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/11 Re: [bitcoindev] BIP 54 active on Bitcoin Inquisition 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/09 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] 24 bits for nVersion nonce space instead of 16 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/09 [bitcoindev] Re: Q-Lock: Quantum-Resistant Spending via ECDSA + Hash-Based Secrets Alex
• 2026/03/08 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Peer Feature Negotiation Anthony Towns
• 2026/03/06 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update 'Brandon Black' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/06 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Ian Quantum
• 2026/03/04 Re: [bitcoindev] Bip54: add sequence, timestamp (and version) to GBT Sjors Provoost
• 2026/03/04 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP-352: Limiting the number of per-group recipients (K_max) Sebastian Falbesoner
• 2026/03/03 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update 'Brandon Black' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/03/02 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Light
• 2026/03/01 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Alex
• 2026/03/01 [bitcoindev] Re: [BIP Proposal] Peer Feature Negotiation Antoine Riard
• 2026/03/01 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/27 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/27 Re: [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] 24 bits for nVersion nonce space instead of 16 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/27 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/26 [bitcoindev] [BIP Draft] 24 bits for nVersion nonce space instead of 16 Matt Corallo
• 2026/02/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Matt Corallo
• 2026/02/26 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'Mikhail Kudinov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/25 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Alex
• 2026/02/25 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Ethan Heilman
• 2026/02/25 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Jameson Lopp
• 2026/02/25 Re: [bitcoindev] BIP 54 active on Bitcoin Inquisition Jameson Lopp
• 2026/02/25 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Erik Aronesty
• 2026/02/25 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Bob Burnett
• 2026/02/25 [bitcoindev] Re: The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2026/02/25 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Javier Mateos
• 2026/02/24 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update neonrooks
• 2026/02/24 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Alex
• 2026/02/24 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Erik Aronesty
• 2026/02/24 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Alex
• 2026/02/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
• 2026/02/23 [bitcoindev] Bitcoin PIPEs v2. Overview and feedback request. 'Misha Komarov' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Erik Aronesty
• 2026/02/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Isabel Foxen Duke
• 2026/02/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Isabel Foxen Duke
• 2026/02/23 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/20 [bitcoindev] Extensions to standard tooling for TEMPLATEHASH-CSFS-IK support 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/19 [bitcoindev] Re: BIP-352: Limiting the number of per-group recipients (K_max) Sebastian Falbesoner
• 2026/02/19 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Garlo Nicon
• 2026/02/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Re: The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Alex
• 2026/02/18 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Mike Casey
• 2026/02/17 [bitcoindev] Re: The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Pieter Wuille
• 2026/02/17 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Garlo Nicon
• 2026/02/17 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Garlo Nicon
• 2026/02/16 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/16 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/16 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin 'conduition' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/16 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin sadiq Ismail
• 2026/02/16 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Jameson Lopp
• 2026/02/15 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Matt Corallo
• 2026/02/14 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2026/02/14 [bitcoindev] Re: The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin waxwing/ AdamISZ
• 2026/02/14 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Light
• 2026/02/14 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/13 [bitcoindev] BIP 54 active on Bitcoin Inquisition 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
• 2026/02/13 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Erik Aronesty
• 2026/02/13 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Light
• 2026/02/13 Re: [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Ethan Heilman
• 2026/02/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Hourglass V2 Update Light
• 2026/02/13 [bitcoindev] The limitations of cryptographic agility in Bitcoin Pieter Wuille
• 2026/02/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Matt Corallo
• 2026/02/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Ethan Heilman
• 2026/02/13 Re: [bitcoindev] Algorithm Agility for Bitcoin to maintain security in the face of quantum and classic breaks in the signature algorithms Matt Corallo

• Earlier messages