did you use the generic redhat version of BIND or compile from source? Redhat does a number of things to alot of deault installs (for example apache) that really screws them up.
I would recommend ripping out that BIND rpm and installing from source. -=e On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, P a u l Guth wrote: > OK, so I have this redhat9 box, and BIND is really really sucking. > Like it runs fine for "a while" (long enough that waiting for > the problem to reoccur for debugging is prohibitive, but not long > enough that I can shrug it off and restart it when it screws up). > > My question is, does redhat 9 with BIND just suck in general, or > is there something specific to my system going weird? > > I have BIND setup as a simple caching-only nameserver, and yes > I know my way around a BIND config. > > ___________________________________________________________________ > P a u l > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > Bits mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits > _______________________________________________ Bits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
