> No chance :)
>
> I'm not saying that it wouldn't benefit from more features,
> but I don't think paying for it is the answer.
>
> One thing that would be interesting though, would be a modperl
> version of a client... If the current code was developed with
> the -w switch and "use strict" - might have been less trouble
> to convert... oh well.
Thanx for the suggestion! :-)
I think it will be re-written to be able to run as FastCGI... I find that
better than modperl. But we can do that at the same time, too.
- Cs.
