Below is an email from Stan Potrantz who many of you know is a "good" guy from Premier Fencing and who now is part of the committee representing the sheep industry in the USDA's design of a national animal ID program. His email explains the ear tags and numbering system. What I learned from his email is that instead of purchasing the new 2x tags and applicator from Premier to replace the system that tore our animals' ears so badly, the government will provide these tags for you upon request.
__________________________________________
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 17:43:42 -0600
From: Stan Potratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tags for national ID - some answers


Hi folks,

I'll try to answer some of the points raised in today's posts.
The tags for the current national scrapie program for most states,
including Texas, have a premise number and an individual animal ID.
No tag in the nation is ever duplicated (same premise ID number and
same individual ID number). The state postal code is part of the
database for your premise. States vary according to the premise
number form but most use the state post code (IA in the case of Iowa,
TX for Texas, etc) followed by a number that is unique for that
state. That certainly means that there could be a tag with IA123 and
a TX123. Each tag has either a different premise number or different
animal number. So Bill Fosher's sheep and my sheep may both have tags
with individual ID's 111 but they would have different premise number
(because his premise number starts with MA).

A few states have elected to do it differently (OK & TN comes to
mind) but they are the distinct minority.
It is well know that the early form of plastic tags (long and narrow)
were/are problem prone. APHIS has approved the replacement at no
charge of these to any producer that wishes to have this occur. Just
contact your state office as before and ask for them. The replacement
tag is Premier's 2X tag - which has proven to be far more
satisfactory in terms of visibility, longevity, retention, etc. It
is, as one post noted, more rectangular (actually a triangle on top
of a rectangle).

The proposed national tracking system that is to cover a wider range
of species will change the premise number system if it proceeds as
currently suggested. The premise number will be a unique number --7
digit. It will not include the state postal code. There are some not
supportive of this and would like the state postal code to occur on
the tag somewhere.

Neither the current national mandatory scrapie ID system nor the
proposed national livestock ID system is interested in matching ewes
with their lambs so being present at lambing is not an issue.
The scrapie ID system is only interested in matching premise of birth
with an animal.

The proposed livestock system would go further (if it is accepted)
and be able to provide data ( for those select few APHIS people that
have permission to access it in time of national disease emergencies)
re. which premises (includes farm of origin, auction market(s),
livestock show/fair (s), feedlots, and any other farms or ranches)
the animal was on in its lifetime prior to slaughter. To do this
efficiently it is thought that electronic official ID of some form
is the best approach along with automatic readers at the various
transfer points. This system is far from being fully sketched out
and proven as workable.

I am, along with representatives from an auction market, feedlot,
slaughterhouse, purebred flocks, commercial flocks, etc part of a
small team that is examining the issue from the sheep industry point
of view. We hoped and still hope to take some time (years) to have
the system and its components tested and proven before suggesting
that the national industry should be asked to comply. Thus we might
avoid the clumsy entry that occurred with the mandatory scrapie
effort.

Your comments, thoughts and queries re. this are very much welcomed.
Even with the BSE cow situation, I'm not convinced that the full
electronic ID system with a tag in every sheep and goat that leaves
the premise of origin is the optimum answer. But it may happen now no
matter what I currently think! Many reasonable and thoughtful people
who have looked at this in details are very concerned about the
confidentiality issues.

I have heard nothing to date that feed records need to be kept as
part of a national ID system.

Best wishes to all during this holiday season.
--
Stan Potratz
2031 300th St
Washington, IA 52353
800 282 6631


=============================================== This message is from the Barbados Blackbelly Sheep mailing list (http://www.awrittenword.com/listserv/index.html). To respond to this message, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe or change your membership options, go to http://lists.coyotenet.net/mailman/listinfo/blackbelly To search the archives, go to http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

Reply via email to