On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:11:21PM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote: > I think for namespace-sake I'd prefer -lbb. Even if some people object > to the whole 'bb' thing, it seems to be a common acronym. In libbt, > what the 't' stand for? 'tools'?
23:09 <@nyz> soren: what's wrong with libbt? 23:10 <soren> nyz: the three b thing just seemed so wonderful to me 23:10 * nyz personally hates the 'bb' nickname, and shies away from using it 23:10 <soren> pronounce it. it's a long lib. I don't know. I just liked it. 23:11 <@nyz> heh 23:11 <soren> I remember a year or so ago, a few of us were talking about how cool it would be to see libbb 23:12 <@nyz> nod 23:12 <@nyz> we chose libbt, since we decided to name the library the "blackbox toolbox" 23:13 <soren> toolbox? I thought it was toolkit. 23:14 <soren> that improves it a bit 23:14 <@nyz> it's not really a toolkit, since we aren't going to write all the necessary bells and whistles of a toolkit 23:14 <@nyz> but it does provide some handy things to writing something for blackbox 23:15 <@nyz> (and you could even mix the stuff in the lib with another toolkit) There you are. Just look at all the fun you guys are missing out on by not hanging out in #blackbox. -- Soren Jacobsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] List archives: http://asgardsrealm.net/lurker/splash/index.html Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
