On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:42:37 +0100 J.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We all know that Blackbox is wrapped around the fact that it's highly > minimalistic. This is good. Minimalism is the way every Open Source > identity should follow. Yet, why should minimalism mean bad design? Even > though Blackbox is as easy and light like a feather, it doesn't mean that > the graphics should make one bounce off the land of Blackbox just because > there's a better-looking option. These days, design is everything. And in > addition to having Blackbox functioning as light-weight desktop system, > which it does without question, everyone should focus more on getting the > light-weight graphics to look as if it was a graphical replacement of sex > invented in year 4000. Nawamean? =) >
Well, I've never been more turned on by a windowmanager than by blackbox. Minimal frames and handles, nice readable labels, soft colours and this baby is hot! ;) -- mattias östergren | /"\ compsci student | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign gävle, sweden | X No HTML in e-mail http://spikboll.net | / \