There are about 3 or 4 of us that are working on QS in our spare time, but
as you said - it's not paid so we can't work full time on it!

We're mainly concentrating on bug fixing at the moment, and I doubt we'll
get many new enhancements out - but having said that QS is pretty much
feature full already :)

LB is definitely going to have better support, and be less buggy, but most
of us that use QS use it because we don't like the alternatives (or there's
nothing as good).

My thoughts are (or what I'm probably gonna do) is continue development on
QS until QSB (Google's version of QS, being developed by the original
developer of QS and others) gets as feature-full as QS then I'll switch to
that.

I see that being a loooong way away though!

2009/12/18 DavidAaron <[email protected]>

> I am not sure, but I got referred to go to LaunchBar (I hope I don't
> get damned to hell for saying that...) but I tried it and I don't like
> it. But a friend told me that QS dev was gone and that LB would be
> better because it's a paid app and it will always have active
> development, blah blah blah...
>
> So that is the question I pose, how active is the development for QS?
> Will it be fossilized in the foreseeable future?
>

Reply via email to