Yep - I'd certainly pay. This app is not a luxury item. On 11 Jun 2010, at 19:25, Ajay Goel wrote:
> I am just a die hard fan of this application. But yes, I would be willing to > pay for it if it wasn't free. > > > On Jun 11, 2010, at 2:17 PM, danewb wrote: > >> Well, I'm only one small voice. I've used QS since it first came out >> and still use it more than any other software I own on a regular >> basis. I have tried LaunchBar and Google and have always come back >> home to QS. I have put up with and am still willing to put up with >> things that no longer work... it's still one of the most valuable >> tools I own. I would be willing to pay for it if it came to that. For >> what my humble opinion is worth. >> >> On Jun 11, 3:43 pm, Eris <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Based on years of comments, I think a vast majority of users would support >>>> this idea >>> >>> Saying "vast majority" here is a bit of a stretch. I think the users >>> who didn't support the idea didn't say anything. >>> >>> To the previous poster: >>> >>>> ... there are things broken w QS in snow leopard that's just crucial to me. >>> >>> File a bug report at GitHub; the developers can't fix something they >>> aren't aware of. >> >
