Randy McMurchy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 07/31/05 03:20 CST: > > >>Log: >>Updated to firefox-1.0.6 and added self to Co-Editors >> >> --enable-application=browser \ >> --enable-default-toolkit=gtk2 \ >> --enable-extensions=cookie,xml-rpc,xmlextras,pref,\ >>- transformiix,universalchardet,webservices,inspector,\ >>- gnomevfs,negotiateauth \ >>+ transformiix,universalchardet,webservices,inspector \ >> --enable-crypto \ >> --enable-xft \ >> --enable-xinerama \ >>@@ -123,7 +122,16 @@ >> <para>You should add the <option>--with-system-jpeg</option> switch >> to the <command>configure</command> script if you have >> <application>libjpeg</application> installed.</para> >>+ >>+ <para>You should add <option>gnomevfs</option> to the list >>+ in the <option>--enable-extensions</option> switch >>+ if you have <application>libgnome</application> installed.</para> >> >>+ <para>You should add <option>negotiateauth</option> to the list >>+ in the <option>--enable-extensions</option> switch >>+ if you have one of the <application>gssapi</application> >>+ libraries installed.</para> >>+ > > > Actually, it would have been nice to simply leave the instructions > as they were because these extensions are not built if the required > packages don't exist. It is win-win keeping it like it was. Works > correctly either way. > > Making folks edit it, for really no reason, is just added work for > the readers with no justification. >
My mileage varied from yours. I don't have Heimeros and it refuses to configure with the option set. I decided to document it the way I did for that reason. Why don't we put --enable-extensions=all and have done with it? (Like Mozilla). R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
