On 4/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 06:18 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > > > > - Linux 2.6.13 or later > > I completely overlooked that kernel thing. I have been using 2.6.14.3 > for months, using LFS-SVN without issue. In fact I have two systems > using it, including the one I'm typing this from (see the sig below).
Yes, hal could become sticky. This is one package that is making real demands on the kernel and udev. hal-0.5.4 doesn't indicate it needs anything higher than 2.6.11, which is needed for hal-0.5.1. Don't know if those are new enough for gnome-2.14, not familiar with KDE. If you do update hal, please note note the kernel dependencies for 0.5.5 and 0.5.7 (linux-2.6.15). I think that it would be perfectly acceptable to say that you need to upgrade the kernel to >=2.6.13. This would help educate newbies that believe they must stick to 2.6.12.5 since that's what linux-libc-headers is at. I'd like to hear others' opinions. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
