Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 4/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> + >> +<screen><userinput>sed -i.bak '/CONFIG_H/i #include <linux/types.h>' \ >> + hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_agp.c</userinput></screen> > > This is a totally minor nitpick. If anyone feels like it's not > important, just say so and we'll move on. However... > > -i.bak is just to cause the original file to be saved with the > extension .bak. This is inconsistent with the rest of all of LFS > where the files are altered in place and no back up is made. (Except > for early LFS where you can't be certain that sed supports -i) Using > the extension is just something I got into the habit of from reading > the DIY book, but it doesn't affect the sed at all. > > For consistency sake, should this go? Or should it stay in the name > of teaching through examples? I just don't want anyone thinking that > the .bak part has anything to do with how the source is being > affected.
Lets just leave it in the name of teaching through examples. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
