#2134: Fontconfig-2.4.1
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 Reporter:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |        Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  task                        |       Status:  new                    
       
 Priority:  normal                      |    Milestone:  6.2                    
       
Component:  BOOK                        |      Version:  SVN                    
       
 Severity:  normal                      |   Resolution:                         
       
 Keywords:                              |  
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 I suppose I should have reworded/extended my reasons. I can see this
 is something that is not going to be dropped.

 Paldo still uses 2.3.x as the stable version of Fontconfig. Not that
 this is a big thing, but it does indicate that Jurg has not fully
 tested, or is comfortable, with 2.4.x. I know I am not. It took
 Keith a year and a half to come up with the 2.4.x version and
 within a week of release, it was determined that there were major
 flaws. I'm just not comfortable updating, and the chief reason is
 that nothing is gained other than it is 'easier' to configure.

 Backporting fixes and all that is *not* going to happen. We either
 go with the current version, or go with the updated version. It is
 my opinion that the new version can't be tested as well as it should
 at this point in time.

 Additionally, it sounds as if you (Dan) are the only person at this
 time qualified to support the update. Alexander doesn't count as he
 has mentioned his availability to the LFS project is soon to be nil
 (if it isn't already).

 Again, this situation needs to be discussed on -dev and a determination
 should be made after:

 1) what really the benefits are other than it is easier to configure
 2) who really knows it and is comfortable in helping to support it
 3) who all is going to do the testing
 4) how will the testing be accomplished

 Dan, I appreciate your quest for a 'better' font system. But I just
 don't see the existing one as broken. And with that, to me a major
 change to something that affects much of BLFS should be left for time
 to do months of testing in a development environment.

 Any further discussion needs to go to -dev so that others can provide
 input also. :-)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2134>
BLFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs>
Beyond Linux From Scratch
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to