Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/24/07 10:34 CST: > The last last sentence does use -qt-sql-mysql as a "for instance".
Yes, but I was more concerned with the "requires" in the sentence. > Would > you rather it say the following? > > "For instance, building in MySQL support (as opposed to building the > plugin) will require -I/usr/include/mysql -qt-sql-mysql." I like this much better. I believe it avoids the confusion. Thanks, Bruce. Also, after looking again, I'm not sure we need a 'note' since the info has been moved to the "command explanations" section. I had intentionally put it *before* the "command explanations" section, as a 'note' as I felt it was more prominent that way. Apparently I was wrong as you missed it entirely. :-) Now that it is in the "command explanations" section, it seems we should at least provide a normal paragraph about the option, followed by the remainder of the explanatory text (which could be in a 'note'). No big deal, just some thoughts. Thanks again, Bruce. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 11:42:02 up 1 day, 10:22, 1 user, load average: 0.54, 0.24, 0.22 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
