#5475: LLVM-3.5.0
-------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: ojab | Owner: fo
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.6
Component: BOOK | Version: SVN
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by cjg):
Replying to [comment:13 cjg]:
> Replying to [comment:11 fo]:
> > I've built already snd installed, but no sphinx (won't do it). It was
easier, after comments in this ticket, (from you and ojab), thanks.
> >
> > From the patch:
> >
> > {{{
> > sed -i '/# Support plugins./ iLLVMLibsOptions :=
../../lib/IR/Release*/Pass.o' \
> > tools/bugpoint/Makefile tools/opt/Makefile
> > }}}
> >
> > The patch in ArchLinux is from Armin, probably.
> >
> > It is listed for i686 and x86_64.
> >
> > Tested mesa, valgrind, webkitgtk-2 and icu. I think that's all.
> >
> > Now, rebuilding llvm plain (no clang), to confirm first obtained SBU,
which I found too large.
>
> Ack, I really really really do not want to build webkit again so soon.
I will leave that for another build. It takes way too long on this
computer. At least 4 hours if not more depending on the mood of the
compiler/cpu etc. That would be an over night job as I hate watching it.
>
> I now see that I would need to do just the sbu value without clang and
then with clang, as clang is listed as an optional extra. My way would
have been technically incorrect for the book as I would have just included
a single combined total.
>
> It needs to be built the way you have described.
>
> I will do that for my own experience.
>
> I am picking also that It would be multiple builds of llvm anyway.
>
> 1) To calculate SBU of llvm without clang and without documentation and
using valgrind testing.
> 2) Calculate SBU of llvm with clang and without documentation. Using
valgrind testing.
> 3) Calculate SBU of llvm with clang and with documentation. Using
valgrind testing.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christopher.
With the new release of Mesa, there is listed in the bugfixes references
to fixing the build for the latest LLVM. So some sort of fix must be
needed, unless it does not effect the release we currently have, or is
only for 64bit.
Regards,
Christopher.
--
Ticket URL: <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/5475#comment:14>
BLFS Trac <http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs>
Beyond Linux From Scratch
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-book
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
