Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 02/22/05 13:50 CST:
> This puts a single .so file in /usr/lib for each pam library. I don't see
> the inconsistency with LFS.
You are overlooking what I've been talking about since I started
this thread. :-)
I think the following example is going to clarify this finally for
you:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ > ls -l {,/usr}/lib/lib{read,shadow}*.so
ls: /lib/libread*.so: No such file or directory
ls: /lib/libshadow*.so: No such file or directory
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Sep 28 19:34 /usr/lib/libreadline.so ->
../../lib/libreadline.so.5
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Oct 6 07:57 /usr/lib/libshadow.so ->
../../lib/libshadow.so.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ >
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ >
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ > ls -l {,/usr}/lib/libpam*.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Oct 5 16:19 /lib/libpam.so -> libpam.so.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Oct 5 16:19 /lib/libpam_misc.so -> libpam_misc.so.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Oct 5 16:19 /lib/libpamc.so -> libpamc.so.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Oct 5 16:20 /usr/lib/libpam.so ->
../../lib/libpam.so.0.77
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Oct 5 16:20 /usr/lib/libpam_misc.so ->
../../lib/libpam_misc.so.0.77
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Oct 5 16:20 /usr/lib/libpamc.so ->
../../lib/libpamc.so.0.77
See the difference?
There are no .so files in /lib for Readline and Shadow. There is for
PAM. This is what I've been trying to say all along.
Additionally, the PAM .so files are in *both* directories. They are
not for Readline and Shadow.
--
Randy
rmlinux: [GNU ld version 2.15.91.0.2 20040727] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.1]
[GNU C Library 2004-07-01 release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.8.1 i686]
14:13:00 up 16 days, 22:02, 8 users, load average: 0.11, 0.06, 0.01
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
