Randy McMurchy wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote these words on 04/15/05 17:02 CST: > > >>Yes, I believe I should have rephased that question a bit to say 'why >>the rush?' The above answer should stand to answer either, however, >>gcc-3.3 is not required as long as gcc is not 3.4.0 or 3.4.1, though I'd >>like to get 1.5 done when possilbe as well. > > > Because I cannot determine exactly what you mean, are you saying that > the 1.4.2 version of the JDK will compile okay with GCC-3.4.3 (LFS-6.1 > version)? I never even thought to try it. >
Yes, the patch name is another from the old sytle names. j2sdk-1.4.2 suffers from the gcc reinterpret_cast problem introduced in 3.4.0...fixed in gcc-3.4.2. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/j2sdk/j2sdk-1.4.2-gcc342-1.patch It should be renamed as the jdk-1.5.0-gcc-3.4.2+-2.patch was. -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
