Randy McMurchy wrote: > Hi all, > > At this point, now that we have the JDK and OpenOffice able to compile > using GCC-3.4.3, we no longer need GCC-3.3.x in the BLFS book. Please > speak up if you have some compelling reason for keeping this old version > of GCC in the BLFS BOOK. > > I'm not sure that because there may be some binary version of some > package out there that needs libstdc++.so.5 is a compelling reason. > > So, unless someone comes up with some good reason why we need to > keep GCC-3.3.x in the book, it will vanish in a couple of days. >
GCC-3.3.x is absolutely needed for some non-free apps like fglrx and rar. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
