El Lunes, 16 de Mayo de 2005 02:06, Randy McMurchy escribió: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 05/15/05 18:53 CST: > > The editor's guide is just that: a guide. It's not a legal document. > > If an editor has what he thinks is a good reason to deviate, that's OK. > > We should all be trying to make the book as self-consistent as possible > > as well as consistent with the package author's desires.
But that type of considerations and exceptions should be reflected to can be noticed for future editors. > I suppose that is one of the reasons I brought this up. I added > three new GNOME packages just in the last week. I spent a little > bit of research time trying to figure out should it be: > > GNOME Menus > > or > > gnome-menus > > I decided upon gnome-menus. Now we have > > Gnome-menus. :-( What is the same that you was already using to indexing the package. If "Gnome-menus" is good for the Index, wy not for the titles and TOCs? The same for all packages. That isn't consistent in any way. I will following retagging the remaining pages kepping the package names in titles and index entries "as is" for now, until a final decission will be adopted. But I will not to change the done ones at this time, due that I want to finish the BLFS tagging ASAP to can start the changes required and requested for the new cross-build/multi-arch LFS book. Then, is for you to fix the titles issues using the yet to be adopted new policie, or wait until I have again free time to fix it. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
