Hello,

now I'm compiling the openoffice suite, version SRC680_m104.

After:
- downloading mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz and putting in the moz/download
directory.

- enter the directory config_office and running configure there with
arguments:
./configure --with-x --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.0-m104 --enable-libart \
        --enable-epm \
        --disable-fontooo \
        --enable-build-mozilla \
        --without-fonts \
        --with-system-stdlibs \
        --with-system-freetype \
        --with-system-zlib \
        --with-system-jpeg \
        --with-system-expat \
        --with-system-libxml \
        --with-system-curl \
        --with-system-nas \
        --with-system-sndfile \
        --with-build-version=BLFS-20050621 \
        --with-java \
        --with-jdk-home=/opt/j2sdk/j2sdk-1.4.2 \
        --with-system-odbc-headers \
        --with-package-format=native \
        --enable-kde \
        --disable-gnome-vfs \
        --with-system-libpwd \
        --enable-openldap \
        --with-ant-home=/opt/ant \
        --without-db

At this moment it's compiling and till now no problems. I had some:
- the argument --with-system-db did not work. My version of berkeleydb is
4.3.27, which is not detected right by this version of openoffice. So now
I'm compiling with the argument --without-db
- I installed the packages unix-odbc, nas, libwpd and apache-ant before.
Unix-odbc gave a compilation error, but after a simple fix in one of the
source files installation went fine.
- I use kde, not gnome.

Now what I would like to ask is:

- I found that complilation of something with xmlsec it stopped. It could
not find the libxml/tree.h file. I found this file in the libxml2/libxml
directory. After making a symlink :

/usr/include/libxml -> /usr/include/libxml2/libxml 

the compilation finds the tree.h file.
Has anybody else having this problem?

Stef Bon


        
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to