DJ Lucas wrote: > Steve, you do not have problems, but others do following BLFS
AFAICT, non-PAM builds are fine. PAM builds are still problematic according to this post: http://lists.pld.org.pl/mailman/pipermail/shadow/2005-June/000125.html I don't have a PAM build here to verify, but I think the issue is still there in latest shadow-4.0.10. At least upstream should now be aware of the issue. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
