-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Berkeley DB
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:40:42 -0500
From: Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

David Jensen wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:

>>> Probably we should ditch the run_parallel, just add a note that it could
>>> be used.
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Not if it fills up 12G!  That doesn't seem reasonable to me.
>>
>>  
>>
> I mean used with 'number of processors'.

I've lost the thread here.  I'm not sure what you mean.

>>> I will run a test overnight without the run_parallel.  Then use that
>>> SBU.
>>
> I started it already.  It's less than 10% loaded.
> I'm guessing 14 hours for me!

OK.  I've started too.  Right now I'm to test 150.  top shows:

top - 20:35:49 up 4 days, 19:50,  1 user,  load average: 2.89, 3.43, 2.59
Tasks:  95 total,   1 running,  94 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  7.8% us,  3.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 54.0% id, 34.6% wa,  0.2% hi,  0.5% si
Mem:    513880k total,   391984k used,   121896k free,    39040k buffers
Swap:  2097140k total,      904k used,  2096236k free,    78940k cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
 7508 bdubbs    20   0 20788 8140 1808 S  6.3  1.6   0:02.50 tclsh8.4
 4587 bdubbs    16   0 20088 7144 2020 S  5.3  1.4   0:09.05 tclsh8.4
 4590 bdubbs    17   0 20088 7144 2020 S  5.3  1.4   0:09.35 tclsh8.4
 7874 bdubbs    17   0 20792 8124 1792 S  4.6  1.6   0:02.01 tclsh8.4
 4591 bdubbs    17   0 20088 7144 2020 S  3.0  1.4   0:09.12 tclsh8.4
 4594 bdubbs    17   0 20088 7140 2020 S  2.3  1.4   0:09.02 tclsh8.4

To run, what I did was:

$cat >> testit << "EOF"
#!/usr/bin/tclsh

source ../test/test.tcl
run_parallel 4 run_std
EOF

$ chmod +x testit
$ time ./testit

I'll let you know what happens.

  -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to