On 7/28/05, Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tushar Teredesai wrote: > > Hi: > > > > I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before releasing > > 6.1: > > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019 > Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of suggestions in the > bug, but I don't see anything definitive.
I was actually voting for this sentence: "If this bug is not fixed until 2004-12-01, it will be marked as "WONTFIX" here and transferred to LFS Bugzilla." > > > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020 > Which of the alternative fixes do you propose we use? Alex already answered this. > > * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1477 > Do we have confirmation of the problem (or the fix)? Still waiting for a response. I think it is a problem with fc-cache since a reinstall of fontconfig fixed it. > > > As a trade-off most of the package update bugs targetted for 6.1 can > > be postponed. > > Right now there are 38 outstanding 6.1 bugs. Of these, 14 have been > accepted by editors. Which bugs do you suggest we postpone? > > Several of these probably are pretty quick: 1362, 1380, 1430, 1434, > 1447, 1448, 1453, 1364, 1365. > > I think we should probably defer 1433, 1449, 1451. > > I'm open to specific suggestions like you gave above. Like Randy suggested in a thread before, since version updates are a never ending process, we should fix the non-package update bugs and the security related bugs for 6.1. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
