TheOldFellow wrote: > Randy McMurchy wrote: >>I will admit I never used it, however, there were a couple of guys >>that responded to my query after the update if things worked okay, >>and they responded yes. >> > That is, of course, the other way to do the validation - get a user > group to do it for you. > > I guess that, methodologically speaking, we could formalise that, and > include packages that no editor uses, provided that there is a vocal > user group to test the builds in production.
One interesting approach would be to do something like PHP does and allow users to post comments on each page. I do not have a good idea about how to go about doing that. A WiKi is one possibility or a custom php application would be another. If no one ever adds comments to a page, then we could conclude that either the instructions are perfect (right!) or no one uses that package. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
