DJ Lucas wrote: > Woah! Postfix (1405) should be in there too. The current patch and TLS > instructions are wrong. The patch is no longer needed since 2.2 and the > define is now -DUSE_TLS. I've not built it since 2.1.4...maybe 2.1.9. > I remember doing a newer version on a test system at some point, but it > never made the pivot into production. That was next on my list after > alsa and the new bootscript tarball.
I can only go by what is in the bug. Are the current instructions for the specified version wrong? If so, go ahead and fix it. If not, we need to get the other bugs targeted for 6.1 fixed this weekend. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
